Monthly Archives

June 2020

    Physical Computing

    by Guest Author

    By Abbie Schenk

    Photo Source: Sparkfun.com

    Imagine a programming workshop: students sitting behind monitors and laptops, quietly  typing line after line of code to make their computers spit out words, solve math problems, and manipulate pixels on those same screens. Their education is almost entirely contained to the virtual realm. 

    But a different form of computer science education has emerged in the last few years: physical computing.

    “A recent growth area in computer science education is physical computing, which involves combining software and hardware to build interactive physical systems that sense and respond to the real world” (Hodges et al., 2020, p. 20).

    One of the most common forms of physical computing is the Arduino system, which uses a simplified programming language to manipulate various sensors, moveable parts, and more. The Arduino project can be used to create robots, games, alarms, and other projects.

    Physical computing aligns with a constructionist pedagogical approach, where knowledge is reconstructed through the manipulation of materials rather than just being transmitted— and most effectively so when a meaningful product is constructed in the process (Papert as cited in Dagienė & Futschek, 2019).  Some benefits of a constructionist, physical computing approach to learning include:

    • Motivation: The experience and outcomes are visible, not just virtual, which makes it easier for students to understand what’s working (and what isn’t).
    • Tangibility and interactivity: Students more easily connect with what they’re trying to accomplish and learn concepts such as iterative design.
    • Learning by doing: Physical computing is trial-and-error-based, with no one right solution. This makes it easier for students to be creative.
    • Collaboration and inclusion: It’s easier to have students collaborate on physical projects than all trying to share a screen.
      (Hodges et al., 2019, p. 24–25).
    Image Source:  Arduino CTC 101 Website

    As the Digital Scholarship Centre (DSC) aims for a constructionist approach to our workshops, we consider physical computing a key area of interest. We currently have the following physical computing devices:

    The DSC is currently researching how to use physical computing to facilitate learning. When we return, we will work with other learners in workshops to discover together how physical computing can be used to learn more about our world. If you have ideas, we are always interested in hearing from you at dsc.library@ualberta.ca!

    References

    Dagienė, V., & Futschek, G. (2019). On the Way to Constructionist Learning of Computational Thinking in Regular School Settings. Constructivist Foundations, 14(3), 231–233.

    Hodges, S., Sentance, S., Finney, J., & Ball, T. (2020). Physical computing: A key element of modern computer science education. Computer, 53(4), 20-30. Chicago

    0 comment
    0 FacebookLinkedinRedditWhatsappEmail
  • We are pleased to be celebrating National Indigenous History Month throughout June with a series of blog posts featuring some great resources from our collection that can be accessed online! This week we have a selection of ebooks in a variety of genres for you to enjoy. Non-FictionThese non-fiction titles will introduce you to indigenous-settler issues in Canada and cover important, often mentioned, concepts. Indigenous Writes : A Guide to First Nations,…

  • As we witness the recent events happening in the United States and Canada, we stand in solidarity with our community against racism. Over the last few days people have been searching for answers, particularly, many non-Black people are wondering what they can do amidst this tumultuous time. One of the best things people can do is educate themselves on the issues and history of anti-Black racism, civil rights, and anti-racism. This is…

Older Posts